Frank Sawyer is on a 15 of 24 (63%) college basketball streak — and he furthers his 9 of 13 (75%) CBB Game of the Year/Month sides mark by UNLEASHING his 25* CBB First Four NCAA Tournament Game of the Year
| Sport | W-L | Profit | Win Pct | Since | Archive |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGA | 142-67 | $6,002 | 68% | 2024-01-04 | View Picks |
| MLB | 22-7 | $1,348 | 76% | 2025-09-08 | View Picks |
| NHL | 9-2 | $615 | 82% | 2026-01-06 | View Picks |
| Soccer | 21-13 | $654 | 62% | 2024-05-08 | View Picks |
| Top All Sports | 6-4 | $160 | 60% | 2026-03-09 | View Picks |
| Top Basketball | 6-4 | $160 | 60% | 2026-03-09 | View Picks |
| Top NCAA-B | 18-14 | $225 | 56% | 2026-02-12 | View Picks |
| NBA | 28-24 | $150 | 54% | 2025-05-24 | View Picks |
No picks available now, but they will be added soon.
At 9:15 PM ET on Wednesday, we will be playing the Miami (OH) RedHawks (688) plus the points versus the SMU Mustangs (687) in their First Four game in the NCAA Tournament. THE SITUATION: Miami (OH) (31-1) saw their perfect season end in an 87-83 upset loss against UMass as a 6.5-point favorite in the opening game of the Mid-American Conference tournament last Thursday. SMU (20-13) has lost five of their last six games after their 62-58 loss against Louisville as a 6.5-point underdog in the ACC tournament last Wednesday. This game is being played on a neutral court at the University of Dayton Arena in Dayton, Ohio.
REASONS TO TAKE THE REDHAWKS PLUS THE POINTS: The best team Miami (OH) defeated all season was Akron — and metrics guru Ken Pomeroy ranks their schedule the 271st most difficult. I also don’t love that they do not force extra possessions either by forcing turnovers or crashing the offensive glass. But those are tactical decisions by head coach Travis Steele. He wants his team getting back on defense and attempting to force turnovers risks putting the opponents on the free throw line. The strength of the RedHawks is their scheme and chemistry on offense — and I suspect that the profile of this team is similar to Ivy League teams in the Big Dance who embrace the role of the underdog and become more aggressive with their 3-point shooting. I much prefer Miami (OH) in the role of the underdog — and getting the Mustangs is a great matchup for them. The roster is filled with former high school state champions — and the chemistry of this team should not be underestimated. They made the tournament despite their strength of schedule because they consistently overwhelmed Pythagorean mathematical projections. Put it this way: even if the RedHawks had a pre-game win expectation of 85% for each of their games (which certainly was not the case), the odds of them then winning their first 31 games in a row is just 0.65%. I disagree with the analytics folks who think winning close games is 100% luck — while luck may play a role, I think well-coached teams with smart players perform better in clutch time. I think their 8-0 record in games decided by one scoring possession along with four victories in overtime illuminates a skill. While that is no guarantee they win this game, I really like their ability to keep things close. The offensive scheme is to play fast, spread the floor, take plenty of 3s, and take advantage of the open spaces inside the arc for easy baskets. Their style is effective on the road where they are scoring +2.0 more points per 100 adjusted possessions. They nail 37.9% of their shots from behind the arc, ranking 16th in the nation. They also make 60.6% of their shots inside the arc on the road, ranking third in the nation. They also hold their opponents to -2.1 fewer points per 100 adjusted possessions when on the road. Miami (OH) has covered the point spread in 11 of their last 16 games on the road — and they have covered the point spread in 4 of their last 5 road games against teams winning 60-80% of their games. Furthermore, I think losing in the MAC tournament is now a blessing in disguise since they still made the Big Dance — and now they can fully embrace the role of Cinderella without pressure. The RedHawks have covered the point spread in all 4 of their games this season as an underdog. SMU has failed to cover the point spread 4 of their last 5 road games when playing for the second time in the last eight days. The Mustangs slide in their last six games coincides with the ankle injury B.J. Edwards suffered after playing 16 minutes in their loss to California six games ago. While he is expected to take the court tonight, head coach Andy Enfield indicated he is not fully recovered. SMU has a similar profile as Miami (OH) as they are an explosive offensive team that ranks 26th in the nation in Adjusted Offensive Efficiency — but they have underachieved in that metric in five of their last six games since the Edwards injury. On the road, they are scoring -4.6 fewer adjusted possessions per game, the 288th worst drop in Adjusted Offensive Efficiency in the nation. The Mustangs 3-point shooting drops by -4.0% on the road — and their shooting inside the arc drops by -4.1% on the road. SMU is a very good offensive rebounding team that ranks 40th in the nation by pulling down 35.4% of their missed shots. But the Redhawks are a good defensive rebounding team that ranks 71st by holding their opponents to rebounding 28.1% of their misses — and Steele is likely to prioritize protecting their defensive glass in this matchup. But is the Mustangs defense that is the biggest liability in this game. SMU ranks 93rd in the nation in Adjusted Defensive Efficiency after finishing 16th of the 18 teams in that metric in the ACC. Their opponents make 57.6% of their shots inside the arc when playing on the road, the 330th worst mark in the nation — and the +10.0% decline relative to their home split stats is the seventh worst mark in Division I. And while the Mustangs hold their opponents to 32.3% shooting from behind the arc when on the road, I worry that these opponents are able to take 48.3% of their shots from distance. SMU has failed to cover the point spread in 5 of their last 6 games against teams who make at least 37% of their shots from behind the arc. The Mustangs have failed to cover the point spread in 5 of their last 7 games as a favorite. And while the RedHawks are outscoring their opponents by +15.2 Points-Per-Game, SMU failed to cover the point spread in 14 of their 22 games under Enfield against teams who are outscoring their opponents by +8.0 or more PPG.
FINAL TAKE: The Mustangs play at a fast pace and generates 62.8 shots per game — and Miami (OH) has covered the point spread in 6 straight games against teams who take 62.0 or more shots per game. The Redhawks have seen at least 170 points combined scored in two straight games — and they have covered the point spread in 15 of their last 18 games after playing a game where 155 or more combined points were scored and they have covered the point spread in 9 straight games after playing two games in a row where 155 or more combined points were scored. 25* CBB First Four NCAA Tournament Game of the Year is with the Miami (OH) RedHawks (688) plus the points versus the SMU Mustangs (687). Best of luck for us — Frank.
| Year | Accomplishment | Record | Win % | Profit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 -2026 | #1 in PGA | 66-27 | 71% | $3,333 |
| 2024 -2025 | #1 in PGA | 59-33 | 64.1% | $1,915 |
| 2023 -2024 | #2 in PGA | 51-38 | 57.3% | $363 |
| 2022 | #2 in NFL | 85-55 | 60.7% | $2,423 |
| 2020 -2021 | #2 in CBB | 98-70 | 58.3% | $2,135 |
| 2019 -2020 | #2 in CFL | 9-2 | 81.8% | $675 |
| 2018 | #2 in NFL | 116-82 | 58.6% | $2,459 |
| 2024 -2025 | #4 in SOCCER | 14-6 | 70% | $734 |
| 2022 -2023 | #4 in PGA | 45-35 | 56.3% | $300 |
| 2020 -2021 | #4 in BOX | 10-4 | 71.4% | $505 |
| 2023 -2024 | #5 in SOCCER | 11-7 | 61.1% | $245 |
| 2022 -2023 | #6 in NBA | 90-59 | 60.4% | $2,530 |
| 2022 | #6 in Football | 117-85 | 57.9% | $2,314 |
| 2021 -2022 | #6 in BOX | 1-0 | 100% | $100 |
| 2020 | #6 in NFL | 91-74 | 55.2% | $959 |
| 2020 | #6 in Football | 145-121 | 54.5% | $1,203 |
| 2022 -2023 | #8 in SOCCER | 7-6 | 53.9% | $23 |
| 2018 -2019 | #8 in CFL | 10-8 | 55.6% | $143 |
| 2016 -2017 | #8 in NHL | 53-39 | 57.6% | $823 |
| 2021 -2022 | #9 in CBB | 79-65 | 54.9% | $757 |
| 2017 -2018 | #9 in CFL | 14-12 | 53.9% | $101 |
| 2017 | #9 in NFL | 114-95 | 54.6% | $983 |
| 2021 -2022 | #10 in Basketball | 163-129 | 55.8% | $2,117 |
Frank Sawyer offers unmatched handicapping analysis over a diverse array of sports for his Hollywood Sports clients. Frank combines his over twenty years of experience as a professional sports handicapper with the drive to outwork his competition. Why invest in a sports service? Frank answers that question with a proven methodology. His model for success starts by investing a significant amount of time analyzing each team in the sports he handicaps to serve as a foundation for that season. Frank then combines his team assessments with empirical situational handicapping angles along with the latest in cutting edge analytics to identify value in the betting line. Decades of handicapping experience along with his unrelenting focus are the qualities that Frank offers his clients. Frank produces extensive reports that detail his decisions. He does this for two reasons: (1) clients deserve to see the work that goes into a conclusion and (2) Frank’s attention to detail within these reports validates to his clients that he continues to work tirelessly to unearth winning angles. With that ambition in mind, Frank has expanded his areas of interest and scrutiny to include the English Premier League, the PGA Tour, the WNBA, and UFC/Boxing in recent years to go along with the major four sports of football, basketball, baseball, and hockey along with the Canadian Football League, Horse Racing, and World Cup Soccer that he has specialized in since he began Hollywood Sports in 1997. Frank believes long-term success involves not only continuing to dig deeper into the sports that he covers but also in expanding his horizons with new events that can provide additional tools in his handicapping toolbox with the goal of rewarding his clients for their loyalty over the years.
Frank uses a rating an 8*, 10*, 20*, 25* rating system that also serves a guide for money management: 10* plays warrant a standard bet (and 8* plays warrant 80% of a standard bet); 20* plays should see a doubling of that standard bet; 25* plays are Frank’s highest-rated play with the recommendation to invest 2.5 times the standard bet. For Frank’s futures reports or for events with odds such as PGA events or horse races, Frank usually offers three recommendations in his betting report: his Best Bet for the event; his Top Overlay Bet which presents his best value play relative to the odds for the event: and his Long Shot Bet for a big underdog offer value with its potential big payout. Frank’s signature play his “A-List* release which is reserved for rare and elite betting opportunities.
Follow Frank on Twitter: @FrankSawyerHS